تشكيل مانشستر سيتي أمام كريستال بالاس في الدوري الإنجليزي.. موقف عمر مرموش

أعلن مدرب نادي مانشستر سيتي، بيب جوارديولا، عن تشكيل فريقه لمباراة كريستال بالاس اليوم الأحد، وذلك لحساب منافسات بطولة الدوري الإنجليزي الممتاز.

مانشستر سيتي سوف يحل ضيفًا على نظيره كريستال بالاس، وذلك لحساب الجولة الخامسة عشر من الدوري الإنجليزي الممتاز.

ويسعى مانشستر سيتي إلى تحقيق الانتصار على كريستال بالاس من أجل مواصلة المنافسة على لقب الدوري الإنجليزي الممتاز، حيث يحتاج السيتيزن إلى الفوز لتقليص الفارق مع آرسنال صاحب المركز الأول إلى نقطتين فقط.

اقرأ أيضًا.. مواعيد مباريات اليوم الأحد 14-12-2025 والقنوات الناقلة.. مانشستر سيتي ضد كريستال بالاس وريال مدريد أمام ألافيس وشهد تشكيل مانشستر سيتي استمرار تواجد عمر مرموش، النجم المصري على مقاعد البدلاء، حيث اعتمد المدرب بيب جوارديولا على إيرلينج هالاند في مركز المهاجم الصريح.

ويعول جوارديولا على خدمات ريان شرقي وفيل فودين في مركز خط الوسط المهاجم، في حين عاد تيجاني ريندرز إلى التشكيل الأساسي. تشكيل مانشستر سيتي اليوم أمام كريستال بالاس في الدوري الإنجليزي

حراسة المرمى: جيانلويجي دوناروما.

خط الدفاع: ماتيوس نونيز، روبن دياز، جوسكو جفارديول، نيكو أوريلي.

خط الوسط: نيكو جونزاليز، برناردو سيلفا، تيجاني ريندرز.

خط الوسط المهاجم: فيل فودين، ريان شرقي.

خط الهجوم: إيرلينج هالاند.

ويجلس على دكة بدلاء مانشستر سيتي كلًا من: جيريمي دوكو، ناثان آكي، عمر مرموش ، سافيو، جيمس ترافورد، ماركوس بيتينلي، ريان آيت نوري، عبد القادر خوسانوف، أوسكار بوب، ريكو لويس، موكاسا.

Yankees Manager Aaron Boone Responds to Heavy Criticism From Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez

Aaron Boone has responded to the harsh assessments levied on his team by two former New York Yankees veterans.

On Fox's pregame show before Saturday night's Speedway Classic, the panel discussed the Yankees' recent struggles. Derek Jeter and Alex Rodriguez were harsh in their assessments of the current roster and its manager. They didn't hold back.

"They make way too many mistakes," Jeter said. “And you can’t get away with making that number of mistakes against great teams. It just doesn’t happen. They had baserunning mistakes today—you saw [Trent Grisham] getting thrown out at home plate. You can’t continue to do it. You have to clean it up."

Rodriguez similarly said the team makes too many mistakes and there don't seem to be consequences for them.

"If any one of us made a mistake, we would be sitting our butt right on the bench," Rodriguez said. "I see mistake after mistake, and there’s no consequences."

When asked about those comments, Boone accepted the criticism and said it comes with the territory of being the team's manager.

"Look, we’re the Yankees," Boone said. "When we lose games, if it’s in and around a mistake, that criticism is fair game. At the end of the day, we have all the pieces to be a really good team. That’s on me and all of us to get the most out of that."

He did say he disagreed with Rodriguez's characterization of there being no accountability, but that there were no excuses, and results are all that matter.

Perhaps making things worse, Boone and Jeter were teammates on the 2003 Yankees team that lost the World Series to the then-Florida Marlins. After Boone was injured in the offseason, the Yankees traded for Rodriguez to take his third base spot, and Boone was released soon after. So, yeah, there's some history here between the three men.

The Yankees made significant additions to their bullpen at the MLB trade deadline, but if the team continues to make simple mistakes, it won't matter.

Saiba os planos do São Paulo para o retorno de Lucas

MatériaMais Notícias

Lucas Moura deve estar à disposição de Luís Zubeldía para o confronto do São Paulo contra o Barcelona-EQU, na quinta-feira (16), pela fase de grupos da Libertadores.

continua após a publicidadeRelacionadasSão Paulo‘Descontaminado’, Zubeldía defende crias do São PauloSão Paulo14/05/2024São PauloLuciano se posiciona sobre briga com Diniz em São Paulo x Fluminense: ‘Acabou a amizade’São Paulo13/05/2024BrasileirãoCom Luciano e Diniz ‘esquentadinhos’, São Paulo vence o Fluminense pelo BrasileirãoBrasileirão13/05/2024

➡️ Vai dar Brasil? Aposte no Lance! Betting e fature com a Copa América

Após a vitória por 2 a 1 sobre o Fluminense, o treinador do São Paulo adotou otimismo e disse que Lucas está cumprindo os cronogramas de treino para retornar à ação.

➡️ Siga o Lance! São Paulo no WhatsApp e acompanhe todas as notícias do Tricolor

– Lucas está bem, treinando bem. Já treinou três dias com o time e amanhã será o quarto, quarta-feira será o quinto treinamento. Acho que pode estar disponível para o jogo de quinta-feira – disse Zubeldía após a vitória por 2 a 1 sobre o Fluminense.

continua após a publicidade

Recuperado de uma lesão na região posterior da coxa esquerda, Lucas não atua pelo São Paulo desde o dia 4 de abril, quando se lesionou no primeiro tempo da derrota contra o Talleres, pela fase de grupos da Libertadores.

➡️ Veja tabela com datas e horários de todos os jogos do Brasileirão

Na temporada, Lucas soma oito jogos e dois pelo São Paulo. O camisa 7 ainda não atuou pelo Tricolor sob o comando de Luis Zubeldía.

Tudo sobre

LibertadoresLucas MouraSão PauloSTARPLUS

Yankees Bullpen Reaches Ugly Franchise Low After Another Implosion vs. Tigers

The Yankees bullpen sunk to a historic new franchise low in an 11–1 loss to the Detroit Tigers on Wednesday.

New York's 'pen surrendered nine earned runs for the second consecutive game, the first time that's occurred in Yankees franchise history, according to Katie Sharp.

Consider this: So poor was the Yankees bullpen on Wednesday night that each of the four relief pitchers Yankees manager Aaron Boone sent to the mound surrendered an earned run—except for outfielder Austin Slater, who entered the game in the ninth inning and slow-tossed 36-mph eephus-esque meatballs as New York waved the white flag.

Wednesday's game eerily resembled Tuesday's loss for the Bronx Bombers, who played Detroit to a 2–2 tie through six innings before the bullpen came undone in a nine-run implosion in the seventh inning.

But as poor as the results have been in the two-game postseason litmus test against the Tigers thus far, Boone, ever the optimist, believes the results are a blip on the radar rather than a concerning trend.

"Track record. Stuff. Who they are," Boone said when asked what gives him confidence the bullpen can turn things around. "Obviously, we got to get a couple guys on track so we can create that depth that we can have down there. A bullpen ERA in short samples like that can be a little misleading, like when you have a handful of games where it really gets away and it gets blown up.

"I feel like through this stretch of games, where over the last month we started winning, we've closed out a lot of good games, too, with guys capable of shutting people down. This is what we have. I've had a lot of confidence in their ability and their stuff, but we got to bring it together. We haven't done that consistently enough yet. Can we do it? That's what we're going to find out. That's what we're going to need to do if we're going to make a big run at this."

The Yankees play one more game against Detroit on Thursday before traveling to Boston for a three-game series against the Red Sox beginning on Friday.

Blue Jays Manager Compliments Yankees' Ability to Relay Tipped Pitches to Hitters

The Yankees beat the Blue Jays on Sunday to take their weekend series and move within two games of the first-place team in the AL East with three weeks to go in the regular season.

Max Scherzer gave up four runs and threw 93 pitches in 4 1/3 innings and took the loss. New York did not score after Scherzer left the game because he was presumably replaced by a bullpen that was not tipping pitches.

During the first inning Aaron Judge appeared to signal to batter Ben Rice at the plate during a 10-pitch at-bat where he fouled off four pitches and ended with a home run.

Toronto manager John Schneider seemed to confirm the tipped pitches after the game as he complimented the Yankees on their ability to identify and relay that kind of information during games.

"Yeah, they were relaying. Yeah, yeah, they're good at it," said Schneider. "You know, Max has got to be a little bit better. It was obvious in the changeups. Rice just missed the one you know, foul, homer. It's fair game. Major League Baseball knows the Yankees are good when they got something. I'm not the only one that's going to say it publicly, but gotta do a better job of making sure we're not giving anything away. At the end of the day you gotta be tight. You gotta make pitches. Yeah, it was pretty clear Bellinger was giving it to Judge and Judge was giving it to Rice."

It's been a notable season for both these teams and they may have to meet in the playoffs to determine which franchise really is a first place team.

A.J. Hinch Reveals Plan for Tarik Skubal With Tigers' Postseason Hopes in the Balance

The Tigers' slide heading into the end of the regular season has made manager A.J. Hinch's job a bit tricky.

They snapped an eight-game skid Thursday with a win over the Guardians in their series finale in Cleveland where the AL Central lead officially changed hands. With the 4-2 win Thursday, the Tigers evened things back up in the division with Cleveland, although the Guardians hold the tiebreaker.

Detroit's final regular-season series began Friday against the Red Sox against Fenway Park. They can clinch a playoff berth with a win and an Astros loss, but there's a chance that the Tigers can go into Sunday's finale still looking to get into the playoffs. If that comes to fruition, the good news for Detroit is their ace Tarik Skubal is scheduled to pitch Sunday following his most recent start Tuesday in Cleveland.

If Detroit's season is on the line, there's certainly nobody else they'd rather have on the bump. However, if they are able to clinch before Sunday, Hinch can save Skubal for Game 1 of their three-game wild-card series. On Friday, Hinch left nothing up for debate on the plan for Skubal. He'll pitch Sunday if needed. If not, he'll be on the shelf for the playoffs.

"It’s pretty clear," the Tigers manager said Friday via 's Cody Stavenhagen. "If we need to get into the playoffs, we’re going to pitch Tarik. If we’ve clinched a playoff berth, then we won’t pitch him."

Hinch and the Tigers did schedule gymnastics last year during their magical run to the postseason to ensure they could have their ace available for critical moments while on optimal rest. Last year, Skubal won the AL Cy Young Award with an 18-4 record and a 2.39 ERA while striking out a league-high 228 batters. This season, he's the Cy Young Award frontrunner with a 13-6 record, 2.21 ERA and 241 punchouts.

It's not a surprising move to play Skubal's Sunday start by ear, but opponents can be certain they'll see the dominant lefthander when it matters most.

Was the 2007 World Cup really a disaster?

A series of unforeseen events went against the tournament, but it also got a lot of things right

Sidharth Monga26-Jun-2020Come to Think of itWhen comparing the 2007 World T20 to the 50-over World Cup that had taken place a few months before it, the BBC’s Jonathan Agnew delivered the bigger event a blow in the solar plexus. It is rumoured, Agnew said, that the 50-over cup is still going on in some remote Caribbean island. He was deriding the length of the tournament: 51 matches played in four stages over 47 days.The 2007 edition is widely considered the worst of the 50-over World Cups. The first World Cup in the party capital of cricket, the West Indies, this one came with big expectations, under whose weight it soon began to crumble. Everything that could go wrong did. The ICC micromanaged it to the extent that it barred music and joy in the stands. Pakistan’s coach died during the World Cup, and the investigation that followed was both farcical and insensitive. There weren’t many close matches. India and Pakistan failed to make it past the first round. The final ended in the dark, a victim to the game’s regulations and interpretations. During the tournament’s last press conference, an advertising unit bearing the logos of the sponsors – to protect whom, arguably, the ICC banned atmosphere in the stands – symbolically fell on the ICC chief.The 2007 World Cup brought about a new world order where draws were fixed to make sure India and Pakistan did not get knocked out in the first round. The draws even began to make sure the two played each other in the first round. Just in case, you know. The “World” Cups began to shrink – to the extent that the number of teams came down to ten for the 2019 edition. All this to make sure the disaster of 2007 was not repeated.But was the 2007 World Cup really that disastrous or was it just an opportunity for the opportunists waiting to get rid of the Associates?ALSO READ – Sidharth Monga: Was Shannon Gabriel’s ‘brain fade’ in Dominica a calculated move gone wrong?The 2007 World Cup had a fair bit going for it. Apart from being the most inclusive World Cup of all, this one had a better format than the two that followed it: in 2011 and 2015, the first round , with two groups of seven teams from which four went through, was a glorified warm-up. It was not quite the perfection of the Super Six of the two earlier events – where only three teams made it out of each group, and played the best teams from the other group – but to accommodate 16 teams they had to improvise. All games were meaningful, and lesser teams had a fair chance to progress to the next round. Unfortunately for the ICC’s broadcast partners, Bangladesh and Ireland played out of their skins and grabbed that chance.In terms of playing conditions, this was the first World Cup with powerplays instead of the stale mandatory 15-over field restrictions. In a round table after the World Cup, England captain Andrew Strauss and Sri Lanka vice-captain Kumar Sangakkara both agreed it was a fine addition, revitalising the ceasefire middle overs and forcing captains to innovate.Dimly fades the Cup: the two captains and the umpires discuss the light rules at the dingy end of the final•Getty ImagesOn the field, a broader transition was taking place in terms of white-ball batsmanship. Australia kept pushing on from where they had left off in the 2003 final, trying to set the bar of the average ODI total even higher. That didn’t mean we didn’t have low-scoring thrillers. In fact some of the better matches were played on slower pitches that made 250 an excellent total. Lasith Malinga took four wickets in four balls but was denied by South Africa in a heart-stopper. Dilhara Fernando bowled a great last over to help Sri Lanka prevail over England. Zimbabwe and Ireland tied their game.While close games are always welcome, they can neither be an indicator of the quality of a tournament nor can they be designed into existence. All you can do is provide a fair format and hope the teams are evenly matched. If India and South Africa are not good enough on the day against Bangladesh, you don’t blame the format but sit back and enjoy the breathtaking batting of Tamim Iqbal and Mohammad Ashraful.If close games didn’t come about with regularity, it was also down to the surreal quality of the cricket Australia played. If you went into an auction today with no cap on spending, you’d still struggle to put together a better team. Matthew Hayden and Adam Gilchrist redefined fear for bowlers, Ricky Ponting and Michael Clarke were in the middle order should things go wrong or should conditions demand a little circumspection, there were two allrounders in Andrew Symonds and Shane Watson, and Michael Hussey batted at No. 7 (enough said). The bowling attack had a left-arm swing bowler, a right-arm metronome, a wild thing, and a left-arm wristspinner. That team was as far ahead of any other side as a team has been in the history of limited-overs cricket.ALSO READ – Andrew Miller: Did England waste the talents of Devon Malcolm?Complaints about the length of the tournament are disingenuous, raised in hindsight to suit a narrative. The next two World Cups had 14 teams playing 49 matches over 43 and 44 days respectively. Last year’s event took ten teams 48 matches and 46 days to decide a winner. Yet they are remembered as better tournaments, largely because there were no upsets to deny the big teams the final stages. The 2007 format was not too different from 2019’s – the eight teams in the Super Eights played each other once – and yet it allowed for six more teams with just three extra games. The 2019 World Cup had a similar number of matches over a similar number of days; they were just played by teams that are good for business.A close final might have elevated the 2007 World Cup in the pundits’ estimation. Or if there had been a story they could get behind. Pakistan’s great surge helped them overlook all the flaws in the 1992 World Cup: a daft rain rule, the consequent disproportionate premium on winning the toss and cynical manipulation of over-rates, and several meaningless matches because teams eliminated themselves too soon. The 2019 edition came within one match of containing a full month of dead rubbers. But those two tournaments are remembered for their great finishes, and 2007 – in which a semi-final spot was up for grabs till the 44th match – for the confusion in the dark.Apart from the criminal alienation of local crowds, the 2007 tournament got most things right: the format, a range of pitches that allowed for big-scoring and low-scoring thrills, and the playing conditions. That a coach died during the tournament, that two of the biggest draws couldn’t make it past the first round, that the final could not be played to its natural conclusion, were unfortunate and unforeseeable events. Even today, that format is likelier to provide you a better World Cup than the formats that followed.Come to Think of it

Did the Capitals err in not starting with Ashwin against Gayle?

Also, why is Prithvi Shaw struggling after a brisk start to the tournament?

Nagraj Gollapudi20-Oct-2020Did Capitals err in not starting with Ashwin against Gayle?
In eight innings before Tuesday, R Ashwin had got Chris Gayle four times for just 49 runs in 59 balls. Ashwin has been the third-highest wicket taker in Powerplay this IPL. And yet Delhi Capitals’ captain Shreyas Iyer asked uncapped Indian fast bowler Tushar Deshpande to deliver the penultimate over of powerplay against Gayle, who was new to the crease. Deshpande was playing only his third IPL match. Gayle did not ask for any generosity, but said “thank you, Iyer” by blasting Deshpande for 26 runs, the most expensive over by a Capitals bowler this IPL.Ashwin was asked to deliver the sixth over. Second ball, he tossed a slider that Gayle attempted to sweep but was beaten in the flight and was bowled. Ashwin was proud. Iyer might have heaved a sigh of relief, but Gayle’s onslaught had provided Kings XI Punjab the momentum.Getty ImagesWhy is Prithvi Shaw struggling?
7, 0,0, 4, 19. Prithvi Shaw’s scores in the last five matches including against the Kings XI. It has been a surprising dip in form for a player who had cracked two half-centuries in the Capitals’ first four matches and then hit nearly third against the Royal Challengers Bangalore.During his lean run, both his mindset and his technique have come into question. Bowlers have pulled their lengths back against Shaw which has forced him to fetch deliveries outside his hitting arc. Bowlers who have his number are confident they can trap him; Jofra Archer has got Shaw twice this IPL: bowled him with a fierce delivery that seamed in and then accepted a top edge.Deepak Chahar has got Shaw six times across all IPLs, including once in this tournament. On Tuesday, Jimmy Neesham pitched back of length and on the fourth stump. Shaw was just playing the second delivery from Neesham, but went chasing the ball, skying it straight to Glenn Maxwell at wide long-off. That Shaw has a technical problem was highlighted in the same over when Neesham bowled to the Capitals’ captain Shreyas Iyer. The ball was pitched on length and much wider than the previous delivery that had got Shaw out. Iyer moved his front leg towards the pitch of the ball and with a still head stroked it high over cover for a second-ball six – a difficult shot made to look easy.ESPNcricinfo LtdFormer India opener and captain Sunil Gavaskar on air summarised Shaw’s issue: his front foot was on the leg side when he connected the ball thus showing he was out of balance. Gavaskar said Shaw needed to carry out a “lot of work ahead” to “tighten up his technique considerably.”How Dhawan has ‘swept’ to glory?
There are many things Shikhar Dhawan did on Tuesday that were much better, much smarter than team-mates. Among them is a shot that fetched him many, many runs. A shot that Dhawan has utilised to maximum effect to accelerate and dominate the spinners in particular.That shot is the sweep – conventional, slog and paddle. Overall this IPL, nobody has scored more runs off the sweep than Dhawan – 82 off 27 balls at a stunning strike rate of nearly 304. He attacked the Kings XI’s legspin pair of M Ashwin and Ravi Bishnoi as well Glenn Maxwell’s offbreaks with the sweep, blasting 27 runs from just seven balls.Why did Capitals slow down in death overs?
Despite majestic batting from Dhawan, the Capitals managed just 38 runs in the final four overs. The power-hitting pair of Marcus Stoinis and Shimron Hetmyer could manage just 19 runs off 16 deliveries, hitting just one boundary between them.This was one critical phase where Kings XI excelled and it played a significant role in the victory. Coming into the match today, KL Rahul’s team had been the worst in death bowling, leaking runs at 13.82 per over. In the nine matches before today, the Kings XI’s bowlers had been hit for 417 runs from 181 deliveries.Credit has to be given to Mohammed Shami who has delivered yorkers willfully this IPL. Last Sunday he held his nerve in the double Super-Over victory against the Mumbai Indians. On Tuesday, Shami bowled two of the four overs at death, filled with yorkers, and gave away just 13 runs while accounting for Stoinis and Hetmyer.

Carlos Brathwaite hopes Black Lives Matter changes perceptions in sport

“You don’t want that whenever anyone says something you lose the message because you use race as a filter.”

Matt Roller07-Jul-2020Given the extent to which he is associated with Ian Bishop’s famous line – ‘Remember the name’ – it comes as no surprise to hear who Carlos Brathwaite has sounded out for advice ahead of his first experience in the commentary box.Brathwaite’s experience behind the microphone extends to a few appearances as a pundit during the Regional Super50 – “20 minutes here or there” – but he is now preparing to cover West Indies’ Test series in England for the BBC, as part of the Test Match Special team and as a guest on their new highlights show.”Bish was fantastic. I reached out to him for some words of advice and encouragement, and he made me feel a little bit more confident in myself to be honest,” Brathwaite tells ESPNcricinfo. “I’m still nervous. It’s like preparing to face your first ball – no matter how many balls you’ve faced in the nets, those nerves are always there.”Brathwaite travelled down to the Ageas Bowl on Tuesday afternoon after spending lockdown in Oxford, where his wife Jessica works at the John Radcliffe Hospital. Because of her ethnicity, she worked from home throughout lockdown, but would still go to see low-risk patients, and he admits that it “hit home a lot harder” being so close to the NHS and knowing the risks that his wife’s friends and colleagues faced.He has used his public profile to help raise awareness of the Black Lives Matter movement during lockdown, speaking at a march in Oxford and attending protests in London last month. He made headlines last week when he described taking the knee as a “cosmetic” reaction to an issue that requires a legislative and societal response.This month, Brathwaite will be the new face in a BBC commentary box that has until recently been home to Geoffrey Boycott – who was forced to apologise during West Indies’ last tour to the UK in 2017 after suggesting he would have been knighted if he had “blacked up” – and has for some time been a space dominated by white men.

“I know in sport that it is prevalent. Black players are seen as players that can give you height, steel, strength. But when it comes to guile, you look more towards white players.”CARLOS BRATHWAITE

Last week, a report was published which revealed a “clear and significant” problem with racial bias in English football commentary, which has already led to introspection within the industry through unconscious bias training. The study found that white players are substantially more likely to be praised for their skill and intelligence compared to black players, who are reduced to pace, power, and other physical attributes. Brathwaite says he recognises a similar phenomenon in cricket.”I don’t want to speak out of turn just for the sake of saying it. Obviously there’s Bish, there’s Pommie Mbangwa who I rate very highly as a commentator, but there aren’t that many black commentators you can single out. With Michael Holding, I could probably count three.”I don’t know the space of commentary and media well enough to speak to their pathway or their individual rise, but I know in sport that it is prevalent. Black players are seen as players that can give you height, steel, strength. But when it comes to guile, you look more towards white players.”As a football fan, it’s something that I see. How many No. 10s or creative players do we see in the Premier League who are black? A good example would be John Obi Mikel, who came from Nigeria and the Under-20 World Cup as a No. 10 and got turned into a defensive midfielder by Chelsea. I can’t say exactly why, but my perception of it is: big, tall, strong, and black – you should run long and hard.”There is that perception and stereotyping in sport. Hopefully with the Black Lives Matter movement and the awareness of the racial bias that’s happening in the world today, it’s brought that to light and more black players will be seen as intelligent as well.”Carlos Brathwaite shapes to throw a ball•BCCIIn English cricket, there has been a noticeable, but often uncomfortable shift in the tone and language used by fans and in the media since Jofra Archer’s first international call-up at the start of last summer; never before has a player’s “body language” been up for discussion to such an extent.”Jof is laid back, but this all boils down to respect,” Brathwaite says. “I’ve heard it myself: I’ve been at franchises where I’ve tried to work my socks off as best I could, but as soon as you sit down they say: ‘ah, you’re resting, you’re relaxing.’ You might be early for a team meeting and they’ll be like: ‘I’m surprised to see you early’. Well, I’ve been early for the last 25 team meetings. Why is it a surprise?”It is a stereotype. It isn’t always racial, but traditionally persons from the Caribbean are more laid back than elsewhere. In England everything moves so quickly, so everyone is just on edge to do, do, do. In the Caribbean we relax and take more time out. I don’t always think it’s racially biased, but it’s about using those bits of information to then listen to the follow-up remarks and retorts in the conversation.”I don’t think every single thing that’s said about Jofra – positive or negative – has a connotation to his race or his colour. But it’s about listening to how people speak and what they follow up with when they speak about him.”And what about another trope that will inevitably come up on this tour whenever a West Indies batsman hits a six: ‘natural Caribbean flair’? “If you unpack it, it can be considered a stereotype, [the idea that] we just walk out of the womb, pick a bat up and hit sixes,” he says. “That we didn’t do the same amount of running, pumping weights that other guys do, that we’re just born with biceps and muscles to hit the ball out the park.”It doesn’t have to be racially motivated: if you can say there’s ten Caribbean players in the IPL and nine of them hit sixes or bowl fast, then fine. But it’s when that conversation continues and goes down a path of subjecting the person because of race. You don’t want that whenever anyone says something that you lose the message because you use race as a filter. It’s important to be aware of that potential filter, and to be cognisant of it, but not to always use it as a yardstick to shy away from criticism.”

“I’ve been at franchises where I’ve tried to work my socks off as best I could, but as soon as you sit down they say: ‘ah, you’re resting, you’re relaxing.’ You might be early for a team meeting and they’ll be like: ‘I’m surprised to see you early’. Well, I’ve been early for the last 25 team meetings. Why is it a surprise?”CARLOS BRATHWAITE

After this series, Brathwaite will travel to Trinidad for the CPL, after being signed by Jamaica Tallawahs in last week’s draft. He hopes to use the tournament as “a springboard” to get back into the West Indies’ T20I team, having lost both the captaincy and his place in the side at the end of last year.He has not been in regular contact with Phil Simmons, the head coach, and says instead: “It’s been up to me to go on a journey where I’ve been self-reflecting, and get to a place mentally and physically where I’m happy. I’m ready and raring to go, and I want to make it back into the team to represent West Indies at another World Cup – and hopefully help us defend the cup.”For now, though, his focus is on the Test series. He is reluctant to take any kind of credit for Ben Stokes’ journey from that night in Kolkata to captaining England for the first time this week, but says that cricket “needs Ben Stokes-type characters, who ruffle feathers and are there with bat or ball in the 90th over of a day’s play”.And while he does not think that the Stokes v Jason Holder narrative will necessarily determine the series, he hopes that West Indies’ captain can demonstrate why he is the No. 1-ranked allrounder by the ICC with the world’s eyes on him.”I don’t think they consider it to be: ‘oh, Jason made 70, I need to make 100′ or anything. It’s just two very good players trying to be the best they can for their teams. But it’ll be a good rivalry: Stokes’ story has been told and he’s received all those accolades, but I don’t think Jason has received the recognition that he should.”It’s important in this series for him to come onto Stokes’ turf and show off, and prove why he’s No. 1. People in the Caribbean will have seen why he’s risen to No. 1, but I don’t think the wider world has appreciated it. The stage is set.”

Ellyse Perry is Australia's greatest cricketer of the last 50 years

She is the most genuine allrounder imaginable

ESPNcricinfo staff29-Oct-2020The 50 Greatest Australian Cricketers (Affirm Press), in which Dan Liebke charts the careers, characteristics and enduring legacies of the finest Australian players of the last half-century.

‘She’s totally amazing’ – Amy,
‘Watch the ball. Make good decisions’ – Ellyse Perry

If I told you that Australia had a batter who averaged 78.10 in Tests, 52.10 in ODIs and 29.07 in T20Is, you’d probably consider them the kind of player you’d want batting in your top order.If I told you that Australia had a bowler who averaged 18.19 in Tests, 24.29 in ODIs and 18.97 in T20Is, you’d surely want them to lead your bowling attack.If I told you that those figures belonged to the same cricketer, you’d probably smack me upside the head and tell me to stop lying. After all, the Australian men’s team, as a rule, haven’t had a true allrounder – one who could comfortably hold their spot with their prowess in either discipline – for decades.ALSO READ: Profile: Ellyse the incredible (2017) In the last 50 years, which man comes close? Shane Watson was handy with the ball, but if you had to choose him as a bowler only, you’d be in a perilous state of affairs. Steve Waugh in his youth was a handy ODI allrounder, as was Simon O’Donnell. But neither reached that standard in Tests. Mitchell Johnson has a Test century, but no sane person would ever have picked him as a specialist batter.However, over in the women’s side, we have Ellyse Perry, the most genuine allrounder imaginable.Perry made her debut for the Australian ODI side in 2007. She was 16 years old, the youngest ever cricketer to represent Australia. Her T20 debut came six months later, where she was awarded player of the match for her 29 not out with the bat and her 4 for 20 with the ball. Her Test debut came two weeks after that. Not yet old enough to vote or legally drink, Ellyse Perry was an allrounder in all three formats of the game.At this stage, however, she was primarily a bowling allrounder, who batted in the bottom half of the line-up and was only expected to contribute occasional runs. This would be her position for the first half of her career.Despite an ankle injury bothering her when she started bowling in the 2013 World Cup final, Ellyse Perry took 3 for 19 to help dismiss West Indies for 145•Pal Pillai/Getty ImagesThis slightly reduced role didn’t stop her from having an impact. In the 2010 World T20, the still-teenaged Perry was given the last over of the final, with New Zealand needing 14 to win and the big-hitting Sophie Devine at the crease. Perry saw the game out, using her football skills to intercept with her foot a straight drive from the final ball that would have sent the match into a Super Over. She was player of the match.Three years later, in the 2013 World Cup, Perry was struggling with an ankle injury. She’d missed a good chunk of the tournament because of it, but was determined to play in the final against the West Indies. She batted with no apparent discomfort, contributing 25 not out (22) to help Australia to 259 for 7 from their 50 overs.When it came time to bowl, however, with the West Indies moving comfortably along at 32 for 0, Perry’s ankle wouldn’t support her. Attempting to bowl her first ball, she was forced to abort her run-up, and limp back to the top of her mark. Her second attempt was no more successful, the pain evident with every step.Yet somehow, Perry fought through the pain and forced herself to bowl the over. It was a maiden. A wicket maiden to be precise, as she removed Kycia Knight lbw from the final ball of the over. From the first ball of her next over, she caught the edge of Stafanie Taylor’s bat. However, the third umpire adjudicated that the ball didn’t carry to Meg Lanning at slip. So three balls later, Perry had Taylor caught and bowled instead. Still no runs had been taken from her. In her following over, Perry had Natasha McLean lbw. After three overs, she had the figures of 3 for 2 with two maidens. West Indies were done. Ellyse Perry had won the World Cup on one leg.ALSO WATCH: 25 Questions with Ellyse Perry: ‘Fast bowlers are cooler than spinners. Just look at them!’Even if you only considered her bowling feats at this stage of her career, that would have been enough to see her acknowledged as one of Australia’s finest ever cricketers.From the middle of 2013 on, however, Perry suddenly decided to become not just a handy lower-order batter, but instead one of the best batters in the world. Perhaps, given that her international soccer career was winding down, she was bored and looking for a new challenge.The improvement in Perry’s batting from 2013 on was most noticeable in the longer forms of the game. Her batting average in ODIs, which was 21.86 from 54 matches up to the 2013 World Cup final, transformed into an average of 70.58 from 58 games afterwards. In Tests, her batting average of 22.66 from three Tests prior to 2013 jumped to 111.20 from five Tests afterwards.Granted, those Test figures are a very small sample size. On the other hand, they’re the only Tests that the women get to play, and jumping from 22.66 to 111.20 is certainly better than moving in the other direction. Furthermore, given the jump in her ODI batting records, which is over a far more statistically significant sample, it’s not crazy to think Perry’s Test batting might genuinely have improved dramatically as well.Certainly, when she was compiling a patient 213 not out in the 2017 Ashes Test and then following it up with 116 and 76 not out in the 2019 version, one got the distinct impression that her batting at Test level had advanced a notch or two.Perry’s 213 not out in the 2017 Ashes is the highest Test score by an Australian female batter•Getty ImagesRegardless of how precisely Perry’s astonishing Test batting figures reflect her true ability at that level, there’s little doubt that she’s one of the elite batters in women’s cricket these days.Oh, and her bowling has also maintained its previous spectacular standard throughout this period of her batting improvement.All of which makes Ellyse Alexandra Perry an impossibly good package of a cricketer.A decent trick question a seasoned cricket fan can ask a more casual fan is to name the greatest cricketer of all time. Most such casual fans will unhesitatingly blurt out “Bradman” as the answer.But Bradman was merely the greatest batter of all time. The more nuanced answer is to consider both batting and bowling and pin your vote on Sir Garfield Sobers, who had a batting average of 57.78 and a bowling average of 34.03.Despite the difficulties of comparing different eras and the different formats played, it’s not crazy to consider Ellyse Perry the Sobers of women’s cricket. She’s got a similarly mind-boggling record with both bat and ball over a similarly long career.And so if I told you that Ellyse Perry was Australia’s greatest cricketer of the last 50 years, you’d have to at least consider the possibility that I was telling the truth.Which is convenient, because that’s exactly what I am telling you: Ellyse Perry is Australia’s greatest cricketer of the last 50 years.This excerpt has been edited lightly to ESPNcricinfo house style

Game
Register
Service
Bonus