Travis Head on SRH's batting: 'We've wanted to be exciting the whole time'

The opener’s 41-ball 102 set up Sunrisers Hyderabad’s record-breaking 287 for 3 at the Chinnaswamy

ESPNcricinfo staff15-Apr-20242:47

Head: Impact Player rule has helped us push the boundaries

After helping Sunrisers Hyderabad amass 287 for 3 with a 39-ball century and break the IPL record for highest total for the second time this season, opener Travis Head said his side would fancy targeting 300 as their next challenge. He also credited the captain Pat Cummins and head coach Daniel Vettori for pushing the openers to keep being aggressive in the first six overs.”[Our total] needs a three in front of it, does it now?” Head joked, when asked between innings about the benchmarks Sunrisers are setting for themselves, after the first innings against Royal Challengers Bengaluru on Monday. “It’s proper batting. We’ve wanted to be exciting the whole time, and we’ve wanted to take the game on, and Pat and then Dan have put pressure on the batting line-up to make sure we try and maximise the powerplay and then keep going.”We’ve got guys like [Heinrich] Klaasen, [Abdul] Samad and Nitish [Kumar Reddy, who] didn’t even get a hit today. We’ve got some power through the middle, and we want to keep just putting the foot down as much as we can. We know that’s not always guaranteed, but at the moment I think we’re setting it up really well in each game and getting to the score that we need.”Related

Maxwell takes a break to refresh after asking to be rested by RCB

Shock and awe all around at Head's hair-raising hundred

Du Plessis: 'When the confidence is low, there's nowhere to hide'

Stats – Sunrisers Hyderabad break their own record for highest-ever IPL total

Head, Klaasen play decisive hands in Chinnaswamy big bash

Sunrisers smashed 22 sixes, the most in IPL history, and Head hit nine of them. Along with Abhishek Sharma, Head helped Sunrisers race away to 76 for 0 in the powerplay while also getting to his fifty. After the game, Head said he was enjoying batting with Abhishek. “We complement each other really well. He’s a young player and pretty fearless. There was a little bit of spin in the powerplay and he was so dominant against them. I’m loving it.”Head was eventually out in the 13th over for a 41-ball 102. His wicket brought zero respite though, as Klaasen pumped a 31-ball 67 from No. 3. Klaasen too was full of praise for his team-mate for setting up the match and making his job easier. “Unbelievable start there from Heady. It’s a special knock that. Puts the bowler under a lot of pressure,” Klaasen told the broadcaster after the game. “[I] came in and wanted to be very sensible and knock it around and make sure he faces majority of the balls. It is difficult to out-hit players like that so when it’s his night, make sure I’m on the other side and wait for a couple of bad balls. And then I should take over when he gets out.”It was nice batting out there, the wicket was nice and good but the tempo was set there upfront. Its nice to have bowlers under pressure when you come in.”

Playfair Cricket Annual 2006

Martin Williamson reviews the 2006 >I>Playfair Cricket Annual

Martin Williamson11-Apr-2006

Not as old as the Almanack – and thankfully a fraction of the weight – the Playfair Cricket Annual has become as much a part of the English summer as … well … the Almanack itself. For those hundreds of thousands who follow the English domestic game, it is a must-have, even more so in these days of Kolpak and football-frequency transfers between counties. The marking of the plethora of Kolpak players (who are not qualified for England even though they are English-qualified) makes a welcome return.While the statistical information and international scorecards which were once so vital have in many ways been bypassed by the internet, the portability and price of the pocket-sized Playfair still means it represents excellent value.One criticism is that it would be helpful if there were profiles on the potential tourists for the coming season. Space is not so much of an issue, and the most-likely 20 or so candidates would not go amiss. The same applies to the Scotland and Ireland squads who feature in this season’s C&G Trophy. But these are minor omissions.And Bill Frindall, the editor, has taken a leaf out of Wisden’s Editor’s Notes and addressed topical issues, not least in a stinging attack on the ICC and its “gross meddling” and “sheer greed”. He has also unilaterally decided to ignore the matches in the unlamented Super Test and ODIs. One has a feeling that he might be joined by others in the coming years.Buy it now from Cricshop

The generation game, and a new one-day record

The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket

Steven Lynch26-Jun-2006The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket:

Bazid Khan – the latest addition to the exclusive club of generation cricketers © AFP
Has there been a third-generation Test cricketer? I mean, Mr X was a Test player, his son Mr XX was too, and his son Mr XXX was as well? asked Paddy Ponnada from India
There are two of them – perhaps not surprisingly, both recent players. The first was England’s Dean Headley, who in 1997 followed his father Ron and grandfather George (who both played for West Indies) into Test cricket. In May 2005 Pakistan’s Bazid Khan joined this very exclusive club, when he made his Test debut against West Indies at Bridgetown. Bazid’s father is Majid Khan, who played 63 Tests for Pakistan, and his grandfather was Jahangir Khan, who played for India in pre-Partition days.Can you confirm that the stand between Chris Read and Andrew Harris for Nottinghamshire against Durham a few weeks ago is a world record for the ninth wicket in limited-overs cricket? Incidentally Harris batted for the whole of the partnership with a runner! asked Richard Lane from England
Yes, that stand of 155 at Trent Bridge – Read made 135 and Harris 34 – was indeed a ninth-wicket record for senior one-day cricket (or “List A”, as statisticians call limited-overs matches between first-class teams). It wasn’t quite enough: Durham still beat Nottinghamshire by 28 runs. The previous record was 130, by Chris Schofield and Gregor Maiden for Lancashire against the India A tourists at Blackpool in 2003.Who has scored the most runs in all World Cup matches so far? asked Dhaval Brahmbhatt from the United States
Five men have so far scored more than 1000 runs solely in World Cup matches. Mark Waugh made 1004 runs, Viv Richards 1013, Aravinda de Silva 1064, and Javed Miandad – the only man to play in six different tournaments – 1083. But way clear at the top of the list is Sachin Tendulkar, who has so far scored 1732 runs in the World Cup, at the healthy average of 59.72, with four centuries. Ricky Ponting, who currently has 998 runs, and Brian Lara (956) are likely to sail past four figures during next year’s World Cup. For a full list of the highest runscorers in the World Cup, click here.Playing for Leicestershire against Surrey recently Claude Henderson had bowling figures of 54.2-5-235-3. Is this the most expensive set of figures in county cricket? asked David Musgrave from England
Claude Henderson’s 3 for 235 in that match at The Oval were indeed the most expensive set of bowling figures in the history of the County Championship. Henderson shaded the previous record-holder, Charlie Parker – another slow left-armer – by four runs: he took 6 for 231 for Gloucestershire against Somerset at Bristol in 1923.In a recent Cricinfo XI column there was a reference to New Zealand’s first Test in 1929-30, against England. A stronger England XI was apparently also playing a Test in Barbados at the same time. Is this the only instance of a country playing two Tests simultaneously? asked Nick Hunt from Australia
Yes, that was the only time one country has been engaged in two separate Test matches at the same time. Both England’s opponents were new to Test cricket – West Indies had played only three Tests (and lost them all by an innings) in 1928, and New Zealand hadn’t played any at all – so MCC, who organised England’s tours then, probably felt that such an arrangement was feasible, even though several first-choice selections weren’t picked for either tour. The team for New Zealand, led by Sussex’s Harold Gilligan, left first, while the other set of tourists, captained by The Honourable Freddie Gough-Calthorpe of Warwickshire, left shortly afterwards for the West Indies. The first Test at Christchurch (which England won) started on January 10, 1930, and the first one at Bridgetown (drawn) began the next day. The third Test at Georgetown started on the same day as the fourth Test at Auckland. England won the series in New Zealand 1-0, and drew 1-1 in the Caribbean. Plans to play the final Test in the West Indies out to a finish, at Kingston, were scuppered by rain and the need for the England team to catch their boat home – the match was left drawn after nine days.During last year’s famous Ashes series, England used the same eleven players for all five matches. Is this the only time that a team has used an unchanged team for a five-Test series? asked Mohammed Ifticardeen from Sri Lanka
Well, first of all England didn’t quite maintain the same eleven players throughout last year’s momentous Ashes series – Simon Jones missed the final Test at The Oval with an ankle injury, and Paul Collingwood played instead. If Jones had played it would have been only the fourth time that a team had gone unchanged through a five-match series. England did it in Australia in 1884-85, South Africa did it at home against England in 1905-06, then there was a long gap until 1990-91, when the same 11 West Indians played in all five Tests at home against Australia.

An Irish record, and the World Cup's biggest stand

The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questionsabout (almost) any aspect of cricket. This week it’s a World Cupspecial

Steven Lynch26-Mar-2007The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket:

Jeremy Bray joined a select list by batting through an innings © Getty Images
Jeremy Bray carried his bat through Ireland’s 50-over innings against Zimbabwe. How many times has this happened in the World Cup? asked Rae Clarke from Galway
That fine effort from Ireland’s Jeremy Bray at Kingston was the 10th time someone had batted through his country’s allocation of overs in the World Cup. The first instance was on the opening day of World Cup matches, in 1975: after England made 334 for 4 in their 60 overs at Lord’s, Sunil Gavaskar occupied 174 balls for 36 not out as India crawled to 132 for 3 and a 202-run defeat. For a full list, click here. The only man to carry his bat through a completed innings in the World Cup is Ridley Jacobs, for West Indies against Australia at Old Trafford in 1999.What is the highest partnership in the World Cup? asked Satyender Singh from Delhi
By the end of the qualifying matches in the current World Cup the highest partnership remained the 318 of Sourav Ganguly (who made 183) and Rahul Dravid (145) for India against Sri Lanka at Taunton in 1999. For a full and updated list of the best partnerships for each wicket in the World Cup, click here.Who was the first Test captain to bag a pair? asked Reuben Johnson from Stoke
The unfortunate holder of this record is Australia’s Joe Darling, who was out without scoring in both innings of the only Test ever played at Bramall Lane in Sheffield, in 1902. Despite Darling’s problems Australia still won the match by 143 runs. For a full list of the 19 captains who have bagged a pair in Tests, click here.I enjoyed watching Bermuda during this World Cup. Have any of their players made a century? asked Kevin McNamara from the United States
None of the Bermudian players managed a century in this World Cup – their highest score was David Hemp’s 76 not out against India at Port-of-Spain. But they do have one century to their credit in one-day internationals: Irvine Romaine, their World Cup captain, made 101 against Canada at Toronto in August 2006.I seem to recall that David Boon kept wicket for Australia in a couple of one-day games. When was this? asked Andy Haensel from Australia
David Boon only started one match as Australia’s designated wicketkeeper – appropriately enough, it was during the World Cup, in 1991-92, after Ian Healy injured his hamstring in the previous match, against South Africa at Sydney (Boon kept wicket in that game, too, as Healy was unfit). The next match was against India, at Brisbane, and Australia ended up winning by one run after Boon collected Steve Waugh’s throw from the boundary to run out India’s last man, Venkatapathy Raju. Boon might have deputised behind the stumps in the odd other game – the records don’t always mention stand-ins – but that was the only one of his 181 one-day internationals which he started as wicketkeeper.Which player is known as “Baby Boof”? asked Ryan Berriman from Brisbane
This is Mark Cosgrove, the South Australian left-hander who was close to a place in the Australian World Cup squad, and it comes from his resemblance to his SA skipper Darren Lehmann – another comfortably built left-hand batsman – whose usual nickname is “Boof”.

A different stripe

Crab-like and inelegant he may be, but it is his gritty determination and stomach for a fight that are more worth remarking on. “Tiger” Chanderpaul is a man driven by the simple mantra of just doing the best he can

Fazeer Mohammed02-Jan-2008

The ‘business of batting, batting and more batting’ &copy AFP
On the face of it, the nickname just doesn’t seem to fit. Shivnarine Chanderpaul The Tiger? Rampaging, mauling, utterlydestructive? No man. It’s got to be someone else. Not that dour nudger and deflecter with the crab-like shuffle across the stumps. Chanderpaul The Crustacean maybe, for surely those big cats would be deeply offended to be associated with someone who apparently lacks their feline grace, blood-curdling snarl and the ability to pounce like lightning and rip anunsuspecting victim to shreds.Then again, maybe it’s not so far-fetched, for in the same manner that stealth and determination are primary attributes of the tiger, so has the durable Guyanese left-hander emerged in his own understated manner as one of the most prolific and reliable batsmen in the midst of the darkest era in the long, proud history of West Indies cricket.Brought up in an environment that cherishes a legacy of larger-than-life batting champions from George Headley to Brian Lara, Chanderpaul inevitably suffers in comparison with those legends. Not that he isn’t capable of lifting the tempowhen required, but even when he does, it lacks the panache, the flair and the almost regal arrogance associated with the maestros of yesterday, whose flashing blades typified the marriage of joyful exuberance and technical excellence that is celebrated as definitively West Indian.As the first cricketer of East Indian descent to play over 100 Tests for the Caribbean side, he has been content to ply his trade in the shadows of the incomparable Brian Lara – and anyone else who happens to come along and shine brightly for a brief period before the indiscipline and inconsistency that have dogged the former kings of the game poison the latest pretender to the throne of batsman supreme.Indeed, it is only since Lara’s surprise retirement at the 2007 World Cup that Chanderpaul’s value has become blindingly apparent. A tally of 446 runs at an average of 148.66 just two months later in England placed him in a different stratosphere from his struggling team-mates. And even when they all finally got it together as a team to produce a stunning series-opening victory at the end of year over South Africa in Port Elizabeth, the 33-year-old former captain remained a cut above the rest, with his 17th Test hundred anchoring the side to what proved a match-winning first-innings total.He may not look the part, but this is one case where statistics don’t lie: 7294 Test runs (average 46.75) and 7141 one-day international runs (average 39.67) to the end of 2007 are not figures to be taken lightly. But they only tell part of the story. It is Chanderpaul’s single-minded determination to excel as a batsman for West Indies from a very young age that offers a greater understanding of just why he carries a nickname that seems so much at variance with his personality on and off the field.Born in Guyana, Chanderpaul is the product of a society defined by economic hardships and racial divisions fuelled by inflammatory politics. In such a society, every opportunity for advancement is not only grasped with both hands but guarded with a jealousy that borders on selfishness. For a land of such bountiful natural resources and enormous economic potential, the harsh realities of everyday life have meant that those with the means to do so invariably take flight.His comparative silence in the dressing room or limited, faltering comments in front of the microphones should not be mistaken for a lack of conviction – far from it. As one of his fellow countrymen, Clive Lloyd, publicly commented during his term as manager on the 1996-97 tour of Australia, Chanderpaul will stand his ground in any situation when he has toThree former West Indies captains, Rohan Kanhai, Clive Lloyd and Alvin Kallicharran, are among the most notable of Guyanese natives who have made their homes in the United Kingdom, while another from that South Americannation to have led the regional side more recently, Carl Hooper, now lives in Australia. In essence, the theme for most Guyanese seems to be to work hard, make good and get out.It is difficult to see how such imperatives would not have had a deep influence on Chanderpaul’s approach to his cricketing career. Just as talented boys on the other side of the country’s southern border with Brazil see football as their ticket out of humble circumstances, the skinny little youngster from Unity Village on the east coast of Demerara River was obsessed with cricket not just for the aesthetic delights of batsmanship, but as an avenue to fame, fortune and a better life for himself and his family.While others with much more natural talent from the relatively affluent tourist havens of the Caribbean squandered their many opportunities at making it on the big stage, Chanderpaul’s credo has been pretty much the same as when he first strode out at Bourda for his Test debut as a 19-year-old against England in 1994. It is not for him to play with theextravagance of a millionaire, even though he can obviously afford to live the good life now as he heads into his 14th year as an international cricketer. His wicket is still to be guarded jealously. Runs are still runs, whether acquired by flair or graft. And even as the senior man by some distance in the West Indies squad, he is still prepared to do whatever is necessary for the cause of the team and his own pivotal role in it.On the basis of his vast experience and status as a former captain, it would probably be expected that he should demand every now and then to have his own way. Yet he has returned in the last year to opening the batting in ODIs, not so much because it his favoured position but because it is in the best interests of the West Indies. In his own way he is very much a team man without being the loud-mouthed, cheerleading type that seems so much in vogue in this modern, media-driven era. But his comparative silence in the dressing room or limited, faltering comments in front of the microphones should not be mistaken for a lack of conviction – far from it. As one of his fellow countrymen, Lloyd, publicly commented during his term as manager on the 1996-97 tour of Australia, Chanderpaul will stand his ground in any situation when he has to.

I alone: Chanderpaul has made an art form of playing the solo hand, especially over the last two years © Getty Images
That fierce determination and willingness to take on any challenge was very much in evidence on that arduous campaign, where the 22-year-old relative newcomer took on the responsibility of the No. 3 spot in the batting order from a struggling Lara. It was also during that series that he launched a scintillating assault on Shane Warne on the final morning of the Sydney Test, racing to 71 before being undone by a sensational ripper that the legspinner has since often described as one of the best deliveries he has ever bowled in his outstanding career. It was therefore ironic that the same batsman had been ignored for the entire home series against the same Australians in 1995, partially on the premise that he would have been unable to cope with the wiles of Warne. It was not the first time, and certainly not the last, that he has been underestimated.Chanderpaul doesn’t fit into the standard mould of the modern cricketing superstar and has suffered for it. When all the popular, chatty, fashionably attired pretty boys were selected for the ill-fated ICC Super Series two years ago, no serious protestations were raised about the omission of the crab-like left-hander, who just happened to have one of the best Test averages of the previous 12 months.But that will always be his lot, because he isn’t bothered by it enough to attempt to reinvent himself for the sake of being more marketable. Whether or not anyone cares to notice, his is the business of batting, batting and more batting. From living in the considerable shadow of Lara for more than a decade (he will forever be associated with Lara after having partnered him to his first world record-breaking Test innings of 375 in Antigua in 1994) to carrying the frail West Indies batting on his shoulders in the last English summer, Chanderpaul is driven by the simple mantra of just doing thebest he can, whatever the circumstances.He knows the game, as someone who has played at the highest level for as long as he has should, but is not comfortable as a leader, as his brief tenure as West Indies captain confirmed. That painful experience in 2005-06 showed that while he may be able to adapt to any challenge in the middle – his generally phlegmatic style is belied by a 71-ball Test hundred against Australia at Bourda in 2003, among other examples of quick scoring – the burden of such overall responsibility was too much for him. Whatever his shortcomings as spokesman, skipper or tactical wizard, all of his opponents respect him for that tigerish determination and ability to creep along almost unnoticed towards another significant score. Despite never figuring in any discussion about contemporary batting greats, he has compiled 15 Test centuries in the last five years.So it seems the “Tiger” nickname is right on the ball after all, for by the time anyone really takes notice of Chanderpaul, it’s too late: he has already pounced on the chance to devour the bowling in his own deliberate, undemonstrative style.

Save the spinners

Tony Cozier on Windies’ ineffective use of Amit Jaggernauth and their treatment of spinners in general

Tony Cozier26-May-2008
Tough times: Amit Jaggernauth was hit for three sixes in two overs by Andrew Symonds © DigicelCricket.com/Brooks La Touche Photography
The question has occupied cricketing discussion in the Caribbean ever since Lance Gibbs sent down his last over in his 79th Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground in 1976. The answer, given by a succession of selectors, is that spin bowlers will be chosen only if the balance of the team requires them and if they merit a place.Perhaps seduced by the great combinations on which West Indies’ success and reputation have been built, they have shown a consistent preference for fast bowling, even at times when that particular cupboard was bare.The evidence of returns in inter-territorial cricket, where spinners have always prospered, is largely overlooked on the grounds that the game at that level is sub-standard. Those who have been favoured have been given only fleeting opportunities to settle into the demands of the highest level.Two have joined the list this season, Sulieman Benn, the beanpole left-armer, and the off-spinner Amit Jaggernauth, who is the most prolific wicket-taker over the past four seasons of regional cricket. Both are likely to go the way of their recent predecessors – back into the ranks of the Carib Beer Cup.Benn was dropped after his debut Test, in Guyana against Sri Lanka, when his figures were none for 120 and 3 for 59. Jaggernauth had to be removed yesterday when Andrew Symonds savaged him for three sixes in two overs after lunch.Yet much of the problem lies not so much with the spinners themselves but with the way they are used by their captains.Yesterday provided the latest example. Australia had battled through the morning session to recover from the four shocks of the previous evening and the immediate loss of the nightwatchman, Mitchell Johnson. They went to lunch 93 for six. Their lead was building but their last recognised batsmen were together. Symonds, a dangerous aggressor, was on 30 and entrenched.The most plausible option was for the strike bowlers who had created the earlier mayhem, Fidel Edwards and Daren Powell, to alternately attack from one end, with steady support from Dwayne Bravo and Darren Sammy.Instead, Ramnaresh Sarwan summoned Jaggernauth, an inexperienced bowler on debut. In the circumstances, with Australia building to a strong lead, it was an unnecessary gamble.It quickly failed. Symonds predictably went after the rookie, three times planting him among the scattering spectators in the George Headley Stand so that Jaggernauth had to be immediately withdrawn.Like so many before him, he might have a long wait for his next bowl in Tests, however much he mesmerises Carib Beer Cup batsmen. His fellow Trinidadian, Dave Mohammed, the left-arm wrist spinner, might empathise with him.Two years ago, with India seeking to press for a declaration in the first Test in Antigua, Brian Lara tossed him the ball. At the opposite end was Mahendra Singh Dhoni, as long and clean a hitter as Symonds.Dhoni slammed six sixes in his 51-ball 69 as Rahul Dravid closed much quicker than he had imagined. In the meantime, Mohammed’s stats were so spoiled that they read: 3 for 162 off 29.5 overs. Needless to say, he didn’t appear again in the series.Nor are Benn and Jaggernauth likely to in this one. Perhaps it is time for a ‘save the spinner’ campaign.

The best-loved player

The wristy little genius was also among the most universally adored of players

Ramachandra Guha05-Mar-2009If cricket, as the writer Geoffrey Moorhouse once put it, is the best-loved game, then GR Viswanath was surely the best-loved cricketer. I have loved him more than most, for what are intensely personal reasons. We share a hometown, and what’s more, Viswanath was the first Test cricketer I ever shook hands with. In the summer of 1970 my uncle Durai and I were driving alongside Bangalore’s Cubbon Park when on Nrupatunga Road, near the city’s YMCA, he spied a diminutive but for him familiar figure hunched low over a motor scooter. A yell and a wave brought the man to a halt, and soon greetings and handshakes were being exchanged with the shy, smiling hero of the previous winter’s Kanpur Test against the Australians.Durai himself claims that he was in some small way responsible for the rise of Viswanath. A vocal member of the Karnataka State Cricket Association, with some other loud-shouting men he dismissed with derision a statement by a selector of the state junior team that Viswanath was “too short” to play representative cricket. The rebuke went home, for Vishy was finally selected, scored a hundred, and on his subsequent elevation to the Karnataka Ranji Trophy side, an unbeaten double-century on debut. The next season he was playing Test cricket.Whatever the truth of Durai’s claim, I have always felt somewhat proprietorial about Viswanath. And so, indeed, does everyone else in our hometown. The last time I saw him play was in late 1988, in the finals of a city tournament. His side, the State Bank of India, were playing their old enemy, the State Bank of Mysore. Vishy scored 20-odd when his team batted first, an innings that gave great joy to the small crowd. When the State Bank of India took the field, he very soon took a sharp catch at first slip off the bowling of Roger Binny. Binny raced down the length of the pitch, but was narrowly beaten in his attempt to hug Vishy by their team-mate for club, state and country, Syed Kirmani. Both bowler and wicketkeeper were delighted for the little man.But of course, Viswanath does not belong to Bangalore alone. From Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi to Kapil Dev, Indian Test cricketers who played alongside him have claimed him as their favourite colleague. And he has also been the best-loved of opponents. I have written elsewhere of Greg Chappell’s affectionate but wholly untypical acclaim as fielding captain when Vishy scored a hundred in a low-scoring Melbourne Test, and on a better-known occasion the England allrounder Tony Greig picked him up when he reached the same milestone, to the delight of a full house at the Brabourne Stadium. But it has not needed a long innings for foreign cricketers, or commentators, to express their appreciation of the man. I can hear as I write the warmth of Trevor Bailey’s commendation, when he made a short, strokeful 15 in India’s great, unavailing bid to win the 1979 Oval Test, of “little Vishy’s cameo of an innings”.This universal love, in an age where international cricket is marked by bitter national rivalry and the clash of personalities, is truly remarkable. It has something to do with his character, which is quietly dignified, and above all true. It has also something to do with his stature, for as the giant Greig’s cradling of Viswanath in the Bombay Test of 1973 so well symbolised, it was a wonder how such a little man could do so much. And it has something to do with the quality of his batsmanship, to which we must now briefly turn.If one were to subject a cricket watcher of the 1970s to a stroke-association test, to “GR Viswanath” he would immediately reply: “Square cut!” That shot was indeed his peculiar glory, and he played it with rare power and ease of placement. In my admiration for the craft of Bishan Bedi, l once claimed that the slow left-arm bowler was never cut, to which a friend responded, “Yes, he was! Ranji quarter-final, Bangalore, 1974. By GR.” It was a match we had both watched, and the reminder was salutary. In an innings of 65 (run out) Viswanath – a tiny, crouching figure moving quickly about the crease – repeatedly made room to square- and late-cut good-length spinning deliveries for four. (Backward point had a hell of a time, running yards one way and then the other, mostly in vain. It was an experience he was still talking about when I joined his college in Delhi the following year.)Among other spin bowlers, Abdul Qadir and Derek Underwood both have good reason to remember the Viswanath square-cut. It was a stroke he played with relish against the quicker bowlers too. Whereas with spinners he caressed rather than forced the ball, usually playing it behind square, to the fast stuff he stood upright and hit the ball fiercely past point. If one were to subject a cricket watcher of the 1970s to a stroke-association test, to “GR Viswanath” he would immediately reply: “Square-cut!” That shot was indeed Vishy’s peculiar glory, and he played it with rare power and ease of placement But Beethoven is much more than the Fifth Symphony, and great batsmen cannot, even in the popular imagination, be reduced to one stroke. Next on Vishy’s own repertoire was the square-drive, a shot closely allied to the square-cut. This was played off the front foot, with knees bent, and usually off the pace bowlers. On the on side, Vishy played with facility that distinctively Indian stroke, the wristy flick off the toes, as well as a paddle sweep more lately associated with Mohammad Azharuddin. All these shots he was master of till the end of his playing days, but those fortunate to have watched him in his prime will remember too his majestic on-drive and the whip through midwicket – also played by Dilip Vengsarkar, albeit with more power.Vishy was at his best as a batsman from about 1972 to 1975. Thereafter his fondness for beer and lack of physical discipline – here he was a sharp contrast to the abstemious Sunil Gavaskar – reduced his mobility and dimmed his reflexes. Towards the end of his career he came to rely very much on the square-cut and square-drive, and on the leg-side placement; a repertoire thin by his own exalted standards, but enough to get him successive hundreds against Keith Fletcher’s England side of 1981-82.Curiously, though, one stroke-making innovation he left till very late. Watching him at the nets in Bangalore, I often saw him clout his side’s spin bowlers (Erapalli Prasanna and Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, no less) onto the roof of the Chinnaswamy Stadium, but in first-class matches he virtually never lifted the ball. My first memory of him doing so on the field of play is in the 1976 series, during the second Port-of-Spain Test. At about two in the morning, a group of us were crowded round a radio in the college quadrangle, listening to the middle stages of India’s heroic bid for victory against West Indies (they had been set more than 400 in the fourth innings). At a key moment Vishy hit the left-arm slow bowler Rafique Jumadeen over mid-off for four. We exchanged glances, for this was new. Clive Lloyd dropped mid-off further back, but Vishy cleared him again. He went on to get a hundred, and India won in a canter.I also remember Vishy hitting two lofted straight drives off Phil Edmonds in that “little cameo” he played in the last hour of the 1979 Oval Test against England. Turning to a less well-known occasion, I once watched Vishy, at the Ferozeshah Kotla, in a Ranji Trophy match between Karnataka and Delhi, being beaten on the back foot by a delivery from the rising university star Praveen Oberoi. The ball had come in late with the arm instead of, as the batsman had anticipated, spinning away towards the off side. The ball was only narrowly missing leg stump, and the bowler, after pleading with the umpire to give the decision in his favour, sank to the ground in despair. At the end of the over Oberoi made a great show to his team-mates of what he felt was a case of justice denied. Vishy watched calmly but at the beginning of Oberoi’s next over came dancing down the wicket to send the ball into the crowd over extra cover.Even the gentlest of men are sometimes moved to show an upstart his place.

Who cares who wins?

The chairman of the Cricket Writers’ Club, Pat Gibson, warns of the dangers of belittling the County Championship

Pat Gibson22-Sep-2009At the annual Cricket Writers’ Club Dinner in London on Monday night, the club chairman, Pat Gibson, delivered a stark warning about the coverage of county cricket in England. Here is the full speech.Kent celebrate their return to the top flight of the Championship, but there was little coverage of their campaign in the press•Getty ImagesWho would have thought that Jimmy Anderson and Monty Panesar would win the Ashes with their batting?Who would have thought that Andrew Flintoff would turn down an England contract because he wants to be the best bungee-jumper in the world?Who would have thought that the counties of Compton and Edrich, of Hobbs and Bedser, would finish up scrapping over the County Championship’s wooden spoon?And who would have thought that the newspapers of Cardus and Swanton, and even Woodcock and Marlar would take so little notice?When it comes to the County Championship, they seem to have adopted the motto of the Italian SAS: “Who cares who wins!”I said at our annual meeting in April that these were the best of times and the worst of times for cricket writers … but I hadn’t anticipated how stark that difference was going to be this summer.They certainly are the best of times at international level, even though one or two of our members complain about their workload with all those blogs and tweets and podcasts – whatever they may be!There has been no shortage of stories – Stanford in irons, Pietersen on crutches, the World Twenty20 and, glory be, England winning the Ashes and, at the last, even a one-day international match. And the coverage has never been so comprehensive.It is not quite the same at county level, where so many of our members work – or, in too many cases, used to work.The ECB has emphasised the supremacy of the County Championship by raising the winner’s prize to a staggering half a million pounds. But as they should know by now, money is not the answer to everything.There is something wrong with the format when the gap between the two divisions is getting wider every season.There is something wrong when counties are more concerned about the immediate priorities of winning promotion and, more pertinently, avoiding relegation than giving themselves time to develop young players.And there is something wrong when the ECB uses the second division to experiment with a different ball and the selectors infer that runs and wickets do not mean as much in the second division as they do in the first.It gives the impression that the second division means second-class, which is very dangerous because it provides ammunition for those people who think the championship should be reduced.Derbyshire, Glamorgan, Leicestershire and Northamptonshire are among those counties sometimes mentioned for the cut yet these very counties are responsible for producing some of the best young cricketers in the country.Some of you will not have heard of Dan Redfern, James Harris, Tom Maynard, Nathan Buck, James Taylor, Alex Wakely and David Willey, but you will.Personally, I would like to see a return to an 18-county County Championship with graduated prize-money which would make every match competitive.And I would also like to see the ECB putting as much effort into promoting the best domestic competition in the world as they do into promoting Twenty20.As for newspapers, I wish they would all recognize that the County Championship is the cornerstone of the game.It is where the players come from. And whether the coach is Andy Flower or even Fabio Capello, it is players who win matches.

Baggage claims and interesting tunes

Eating out, getting sick, waiting at airports, trying to understand team-mates’ choice of music – all part of a touring cricketer’s life

Nicky Shaw26-Feb-2010Right, it’s game on now. We are in Visakhapatnam, having lost the third match by a big margin. But we are optimistic about levelling the series yet again.The night before the second game we went out to Hard Rock Café in Bangalore. The next day, unfortunately, I missed the match because of an upset stomach. Watching the match go to the final over from my hotel room was nerve-wracking. It was great to get the three-run win. After the game we sang our team song – Take That’s “Never Forget” – and reviewed our performance.The journey to Visakhapatnam – for games three and four – was okay, apart from the early start. Airports involve a lot of waiting – though this time we didn’t have to hang around a lot – and we usually spend the time listening to music, reading magazines or having a look around the shops. Of course there’s always someone from the team sleeping as well.We all have different tastes in music and you’d think Ebony Rainford-Brent has the best collection, considering the way she bobs her head and dances in her seat on the bus when she has her iPod on. But Katherine [Brunt] has some “interesting tunes”, a mixture of rock, pop and country and western.We carry quite a bit of luggage because of our cricket kits, but outside of that, I’d have to say Charlotte Edwards’ bags would be the heaviest, for all the toiletries she packs in!The weather here is more humid than in Bangalore. The third game was disappointing but we are ready to bounce back.On an aside, the MCC women, who will be touring West Indies, will play with pink balls during the series. We trialled pink balls against Australia in the summer in 2009 and we were all very positive about it. It tends to keep its colour better than the white ball.

All Hersch, zero subtlety

Gibbs’ autobiography tells all – and leaves us with the impression that none of it is to be taken seriously

Telford Vice20-Nov-2010The face of Herschelle Gibbs, the man who infamously claimed he had never read a book, gleams unsettlingly from the cover of the one that bears his name.His bristly lips slither around his teeth, which are gnashed into a foreboding grin. Iridescent white haloes trace spooky circles around the pupils of his eyes. The hard edge of his shaven head lurks fuzzy, out there somewhere. If this man banged on your door at some dark hour, you would give him whatever he wanted and plead with him not to hurt you.Books shouldn’t be judged by their covers, but it seems safe to do so in this case. For too long, people have given Gibbs too much of what he’s wanted: too much to drink, too much sex, too many nudges and winks, too many chances, too many long hops. In return he has given them too much of his dark side and not enough by which to remember him well. For years he would cut sixes over point as casually as if he were twisting the cap off a bottle of beer. But just as easily he would blip catches softly, softly into the hands of mid-off. We giggle at his ongoing – unwitting? – parody of the rock-star lifestyle, and gag at his trashiness. He has won matches that looked lost. He has taken money to be dismissed for less than 20.And now this, , as told to Steve Smith, a respected journalist who has captured Gibbs’ voice authentically. It is the voice of a man who is on his way to being a geriatric delinquent.Those who count themselves among cricket’s more genteel aficionados should start their interaction with this book on page 125. The preceding six chapters will shatter their image of the game they think they know. Then again, perhaps they shouldn’t skip those pages: they need educating.Chapter three – “The good times” – is a litany of vice. Alcohol is abused so wantonly that readers might feel sorry for the demon drink itself. Women are nothing more than conquests awaiting conquest.Chapter six, entitled “The controversies”, ends thus: “Right. I think that’s enough (scandal) for one book. Coming up next is a highlights reel that has more to do with bat and ball than having a ball…”But there is value amid the muck. Gibbs’ redemption may yet come from being unafraid to lay bare the car crash of his life for the rest of us to rubberneck at.Young cricketers, particularly those who achieve beyond their years, sometimes grow into adults trapped in a web of adolescence. However much excess might befall them and however much success they might achieve, their worlds are somehow small and sad. Gibbs made his first-class debut at 16, and in some ways he isn’t a moment older. He doesn’t seem to have learnt much from the tribulations that have befallen him over the years.He describes Hansie Cronje, who in a few grubby deals (that we know of) destroyed his reputation forever, as “a man I will always admire” and “the best captain I ever played under”. Even after spending time in rehab, Gibbs writes that he “didn’t, and still don’t, believe that I am an alcoholic”. He doesn’t regret “calling those particular Pakistani fans a bunch of animals” at Centurion in 2007.Also disturbing is the impression Gibbs gives that nothing he has experienced – neither match-fixing, sexual debauchery, alcoholism, nor that particular flavour of racism in which people are equated with animals – need be taken seriously.But the honesty with which he tackles some of South African cricket’s biggest issues is to be applauded. He dumps the Proteas’ propensity to choke at the door of a conservative, tentative approach. He decides that the South African team is indeed divided by a clique of senior players. There is nothing to be read here that the cricket press hasn’t covered before, but to have it confirmed from within is a refreshing change from the overly defensive pose players usually strike in the face of criticism.It is doubtful whether Gibbs knows anything about subtlety, including how to spell it. But he does know how to be exciting, and he loves to entertain. On that score, then, is undiluted, uncut 100 per cent proof Herschelle. It should come with all sorts of warnings, including: reading this book could impair your ability to be drowsy for nights on end.To the Point: The No-Holds-Barred Autobiography
by Herschelle Gibbs with Steve Smith
Random House Struik
272pp, R200

Game
Register
Service
Bonus